UNinvolved in Peace: THERE'S BEEN OVER 150 WARS SINCE THE UN WAS FOUNDED IN 1945

The UN: A Global Warmachine Fueled by Hidden Agendas

Since its inception in 1945, the United Nations was hailed as a harbinger of peace. Yet, behind the polished facade of diplomacy lies a machine powered by the wealth of oligarchs and shadowy interests. The UN, initially designed to unite the world, has increasingly morphed into a vehicle for unchecked global agendas.

- The Billionaire Backers:

Far from the impartial body it claims to be, the UN thrives on the deep pockets of elite players like George Soros and Bill Gates. These tycoons, under the guise of philanthropy, channel billions into UN-affiliated programs such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and sustainability initiatives. Critics argue that these efforts prioritize a one-world agenda—centralized power cloaked in the language of global welfare.

- Mass Migration and Depopulation Agendas:

Through its Global Compact for Migration, the UN has encouraged mass migration policies, stoking chaos and instability in once-thriving nations. While sold as humanitarian efforts, skeptics suggest this strategy is less about aid and more about dismantling borders, destabilizing economies, and eroding cultural identities.

Simultaneously, the UN’s promotion of population control—thinly veiled in discussions about “sustainability”—raises troubling questions. Are these programs about protecting the planet or subtly pushing depopulation? Many view this as a chilling overreach into the lives of ordinary citizens, particularly in vulnerable nations.

- The UN’s Double-Edged Sword:

Far from uniting nations, critics argue the UN has become a weaponized bureaucracy advancing the interests of the few. Its reliance on wealthy nations and billionaire benefactors has undermined its neutrality, transforming it into a global warmachine. Rather than fostering peace, its policies risk fomenting division and control.

The world deserves unity, but not at the cost of sovereignty or freedom. The true challenge lies in holding this powerful institution accountable before it becomes the architect of its own dystopian vision.